Skip to main content
Butter bar
Explore our High Velocity CEM webinar series
Butter bar
Gartner report: Moving resilience from definition to implementation

In our latest Rapid Resilience Briefing, we analyze the new phase-one Gaza ceasefire, a fragile starting point but not a complete peace plan.

Zsolt Gaza

Full transcript

[[00:05.0]

Hello, my name is Zsolt Csepregi. I’m the regional, analyst for the Middle east and North Africa at Eberbridge’s Global Insights Team. Today I will outline the ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas and highlight the associated security and business risks. The newly announced Gaza ceasefire, which was brokered by the United States, Egypt, Turkey and Qatar, is a phase one agreement which is designed to secure the release of Israeli hostages in exchange for Palestinian prisoners, assured limited withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza and expanded humanitarian aid access.

[00:39.4]

It’s an important step, but it’s not a solution. Mediators themselves call it a starting point. A narrow humanitarian and political transaction, but not a complete peace plan. The goal right now is simple, to stop the immediate fighting and get the Israeli hostages home.

[00:55.9]

Everything beyond that, from Hamas disarmament to the future of Gaza’s governance, remains deeply contested. The second phase, meant to turn this truce into a sustainable political settlement, will be much harder. Israel insists that Hamas must be disarmed and excluded from the governance of Gaza.

[01:14.9]

While Hamas for its part, refuses to surrender control or its legitimacy. These positions are fundamentally incompatible once the immediate pressure eases. So the Israeli hostages are home and Israeli troops pull back, both sides will have far less incentive to compromise.

[01:34.7]

External actors are also shaping this trajectory. Palestinian Islamic Jihad has cautiously accepted the deal, but there is still a risk that more militant elements within Hamas or BIG could splinter towards Islamic State aligned, groups that outrightly reject any form of political compromise with Israel.

[01:55.6]

The Houthis in Yemen continue to reject the ceasefire outright, keeping Red Sea maritime risks elevated, while Hezbollah remains deliberately ambiguous along the northern border of Israel. For businesses and international operators, this environment represents de escalation without guaranteeing a resolution.

[02:15.4]

It’s a reduction in immediate violence, but not in underlying instability. So logistics and air travel are likely to remain volatile with potential disruptions from renewed rocket fire, drone attacks or political protests.

[02:30.5]

And beyond the region, pro Palestinian and pro Israeli demonstrations will continue across major global cities, carrying reputational and operational risk for multinational firms. Global companies should therefore remain vigilant and adaptable as this first phase of the ceasefire unfold and negotiations on the second phase start.

[02:51.0]

Even if progress continues, instability will persist across the Middle East. Organizations should diversify logistic routes, review travel and security protocols and maintain flexible staffing and crisis communication plans. Monitoring both of regional developments as well as protest movements globally will be key in protecting personnel and operations.

[03:12.8]

The coming months will demand strategic patience coupled with operational flexibility as the ceasefire talks may reduce violence temporarily but are far from assuring a lasting stability.

Join Adam DeLuca for a weekend update about the situation in Iran and Israel after weekend bombings occurred.

Adam

In our latest  Rapid Resilience Briefing, Zachary Nelson and Wyatt Kinney discuss the latest military developments and rising tensions in Taiwan Strait.

Taiwan Strait

We discuss the continuing escalations in the Kashmir region between India and Pakistan, with both countries reporting civilian injuries and casualties.

India Pakistan

On March 18, Israeli forces carried out aerial assaults across the Gaza Strip. The early morning strikes killed upwards of 400 people, with hundreds more injured. Israeli officials explained that the barrage was directed at Hamas targets, defending the action by citing the group’s continued refusal to release additional hostages captured during the October 2023 assault on Israel. Hamas claimed that the airstrikes killed five of its senior officials, who held midranking leadership roles in the Hamas-run government in Gaza.

This Rapid Resilience Briefing discusses the growing M23 conflict in the Eastern DRC. Learn impacts on business interests, geopolitical dynamics, and potential for sanctions. 

Drc

This Rapid Resilience Briefing discusses the recent events in South Korea, including political pressure, business implications, and advice amid potential unrest and martial law. 

Southn Korea Disruption
Request a Demo